Human rights are more than individual rights.
Aren’t they?
And will surely remain so until we have a level playing field.
I’ve been worrying about what worried me about a recent article about Tim Wilson, Australia’s new Human Rights Commissioner (click here). Apart from the obvious, that is – his links to the conservative think tank, IPA (Institute of Public Affairs), with its links to Big Tobacco, the mining lobby, and climate denial (click here).
The core problem, as I currently see it, is that Tim Wilson approaches human rights primarily as individual rights, consistent with his “classical liberal political philosophy.”
And the problem with that is that it assumes a level playing field; one in which every individual is equally situated to assert his/her individual rights.
But the playing field is NOT even. Rather, it is notoriously bumpy, careering through structural inequalities of race, gender, and socioeconomic status, to name but a few.
The collective rights of marginalised groups (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, women, the LGBTI community, people with disabilities, etc.) need to be on the human rights agenda, as well as individual rights; and that means they need to be on Tim Wilson’s agenda.
Tim Wilson believes “human rights are universal, and are at risk of being undermined when particular groups receive special treatment.”
Wrong. Calling attention to collective rights is NOT calling for “special treatment.” It is calling for recognition of the parlous state of the playing field.
What do you think? Leave your comments…Joan Beckwith.
Written By Joan Beckwith, PhD
Human rights are more than individual rights was originally published @ 2020 Social Justice and has been syndicated with permission.
Our authors want to hear from you! Click to leave a comment
Related Posts
I agree completely with your premise. This theme was examined in CA from an Educational Leadership perspective and found little evidence of “social justice” or “justice” from and human rights v. individual rights perspective. In fact, the individual rights perspective in the view of many causes inequities such as the “school to jail pipeline.”
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-6555-9_38
Thanks for your comment, Monty J Thornburg, and for the link to your chapter expanding your point. I fear our situation in Australia in terms of prison populations shares some of the same characteristics. In particular Aboriginal people have long been overrepresented in prisons, and there is a long and sad history of Aboriginal deaths in custody. None of this will come under the radar under an ‘individual rights’ lens and, as we both agree, that is a problem…Joan Beckwith.